Evil Empire Persuasive Speech
Reverend clergy all, Senator Hawkins, distinguished members of the Florida congressional delegation, and all of you:
I can't tell you how you have warmed my heart with your welcome. I'm delighted to be here today.
Those of you in the National Association of Evangelicals are known for your spiritual and humanitarian work. And I would
be especially remiss if I didn't discharge right now one personal debt of gratitude. Thank you for your prayers. Nancy and I
have felt their presence many times in many ways. And believe me, for us they've made all the difference.
The other day in the East Room of the White House at a meeting there, someone asked me whether I was aware of all the
people out there who were praying for the President. And I had to say, "Yes, I am. I've felt it. I believe in intercessionary
prayer." But I couldn't help but say to that questioner after he'd asked the question that—or at least say to them that if
sometime when he was praying he got a busy signal, it was just me in there ahead of him.
I think I understand how Abraham Lincoln felt when he said, "I have been driven many times to my knees by the
overwhelming conviction that I had nowhere else to go."
From the joy and the good feeling of this conference, I go to a political reception. Now, I don't know why, but that bit of
scheduling reminds me of a story—which I'll share with you.
An evangelical minister and a politician arrived at Heaven's gate one day together. And St. Peter, after doing all the
necessary formalities, took them in hand to show them where their quarters would be. And he took them to a small, single
room with a bed, a chair, and a table and said this was for the clergyman. And the politician was a little worried about what
might be in store for him. And he couldn't believe it then when St. Peter stopped in front of a beautiful mansion with lovely
grounds, many servants, and told him that these would be his quarters.
And he couldn't help but ask, he said, "But wait, how—there's something wrong—how do I get this mansion while that good
and holy man only gets a single room?" And St. Peter said, "You have to understand how things are up here. We've got
thousands and thousands of clergy. You're the first politician who ever made it."
But I don't want to contribute to a stereotype. So, I tell you there are a great many God-fearing, dedicated, noble men and
women in public life, present company included. And, yes, we need your help to keep us ever mindful of the ideas and the
principles that brought us into the public arena in the first place.
The basis of those ideals and principles is a commitment to freedom and personal liberty that, itself, is grounded in the
much deeper realization that freedom prospers only where the blessings of God are avidly sought and humbly accepted.
The American experiment in democracy rests on this insight.
Its discovery was the great triumph of our Founding Fathers, voiced by William Penn when he said: "If we will not be
governed by God, we must be governed by tyrants." Explaining the inalienable rights of men, Jefferson said: "The God who
gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time." And it was George Washington who said that "of all the dispositions and
habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports."
And finally, that shrewdest of all observers of American democracy, Alexis de Tocqueville, put it eloquently after he had
gone on a search for the secret of America's greatness and genius—and he said: "Not until I went into the churches of
America and heard her pulpits aflame with righteousness did I understand the greatness and the genius of America. . . .
America is good. And if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great."
Well, I'm pleased to be here today with you who are keeping America great by keeping her good. Only through your work
and prayers and those of millions of others can we hope to survive this perilous century and keep alive this experiment in
liberty, this last, best hope of man.
I want you to know that this administration is motivated by a political philosophy that sees the greatness of America in you,
her people, and in your families, churches, neighborhoods, communities—the institutions that foster and nourish values like
concern for others and respect for the rule of law under God.
Now, I don't have to tell you that this puts us in opposition to, or at least out of step with, a prevailing attitude of many who
have turned to a modern-day secularism, discarding the tried and time-tested values upon which our very civilization is
based. No matter how well intentioned, their value system is radically different from that of most Americans.
And while they proclaim that they're freeing us from superstitions of the past, they've taken upon themselves the job of
superintending us by government rule and regulation. Sometimes their voices are louder than ours, but they are not yet a
majority.
An example of that vocal superiority is evident in a controversy now going on in Washington. And since I'm involved, I've
been waiting to hear from the parents of young America. How far are they willing to go in giving to government their
prerogatives as parents?
Let me state the case as briefly and simply as I can. An organization of citizens, sincerely motivated and deeply concerned
about the increase in illegitimate births and abortions involving girls well below the age of consent, sometime ago
established a nationwide network of clinics to offer help to these girls and, hopefully, alleviate this situation. Now, again, let
me say, I do not fault their intent.
However, in their well-intentioned effort, these clinics have decided to provide advice and birth control drugs and devices to
underage girls without the knowledge of their parents.
For some years now, the federal government has helped with funds to subsidize these clinics. In providing for this, the
Congress decreed that every effort would be made to maximize parental participation. Nevertheless, the drugs and devices
are prescribed without getting parental consent or giving notification after they've done so. Girls termed "sexually
active"—and that has replaced the word "promiscuous"—are given this help in order to prevent illegitimate birth or abortion.
Well, we have ordered clinics receiving federal funds to notify the parents such help has been given. One of the nation's
leading newspapers has created the term "squeal rule" in editorializing against us for doing this, and we're being criticized
for violating the privacy of young people. A judge has recently granted an injunction against an enforcement of our rule.
I've watched TV panel shows discuss this issue, seen columnists pontificating on our error, but no one seems to mention
morality as playing a part in the subject of sex.
Is all of Judeo-Christian tradition wrong? Are we to believe that something so sacred can be looked upon as a purely
physical thing with no potential for emotional and psychological harm? And isn't it the parents' right to give counsel and
advice to keep their children from making mistakes that may affect their entire lives?
Many of us in government would like to know what parents think about this intrusion in their family by government. We're
going to fight in the courts. The right of parents and the rights of family take precedence over those of Washington-based
bureaucrats and social engineers.
But the fight against parental notification is really only one example of many attempts to water down traditional values and
even abrogate the original terms of American democracy. Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law
under God is acknowledged. When our Founding Fathers passed the First Amendment, they sought to protect churches
from government interference. They never intended to construct a wall of hostility between government and the concept of
religious belief itself.
The evidence of this permeates our history and our government. The Declaration of Independence mentions the Supreme
Being no less than four times. "In God We Trust" is engraved on our coinage. The Supreme Court opens its proceedings
with a religious invocation. And the members of Congress open their sessions with a prayer. I just happen to believe the
schoolchildren of the United States are entitled to the same privileges as Supreme Court Justices and Congressmen.
Last year, I sent the Congress a constitutional amendment to restore prayer to public schools. Already this session, there's
growing bipartisan support for the amendment, and I am calling on the Congress to act speedily to pass it and to let our
children pray.
Perhaps some of you read recently about the Lubbock school case, where a judge actually ruled that it was
unconstitutional for a school district to give equal treatment to religious and nonreligious student groups, even when the
group meetings were being held during the students' own time. The First Amendment never intended to require
government to discriminate against religious speech.
Senators Denton and Hatfield have proposed legislation in the Congress on the whole question of prohibiting discrimination
against religious forms of student speech. Such legislation could go far to restore freedom of religious speech for public
school students. And I hope the Congress considers these bills quickly. And with your help, I think it's possible we could
also get the constitutional amendment through the Congress this year.
More than a decade ago, a Supreme Court decision literally wiped off the books of 50 states statutes protecting the rights
of unborn children. Abortion on demand now takes the lives of up to one and a half million unborn children a year. Human
life legislation ending this tragedy will some day pass the Congress, and you and I must never rest until it does.
Unless and until it can be proven that the unborn child is not a living entity, then its right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness must be protected.
You may remember that when abortion on demand began, many, and, indeed, I'm sure many of you, warned that the
practice would lead to a decline in respect for human life, that the philosophical premises used to justify abortion on
demand would ultimately be used to justify other attacks on the sacredness of human life—infanticide or mercy killing.
Tragically enough, those warnings proved all too true. Only last year a court permitted the death by starvation of a
handicapped infant.
I have directed the Health and Human Services Department to make clear to every health care facility in the United States
that the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 protects all handicapped persons against discrimination based on handicaps, including
infants.
And we have taken the further step of requiring that each and every recipient of federal funds who provides health care
services to infants must post and keep posted in a conspicuous place a notice stating that "discriminatory failure to feed
and care for handicapped infants in this facility is prohibited by federal law." It also lists a 24-hour, toll-free number so that
nurses and others may report violations in time to save the infant's life.
In addition, recent legislation introduced in the Congress by Representative Henry Hyde of Illinois not only increases
restrictions on publicly financed abortions, it also addresses this whole problem of infanticide. I urge the Congress to begin
hearings and to adopt legislation that will protect the right of life to all children, including the disabled or handicapped.
Now, I'm sure that you must get discouraged at times, but you've done better than you know, perhaps. There's a great
spiritual awakening in America, a renewal of the traditional values that have been the bedrock of America's goodness and
greatness.
One recent survey by a Washington-based research council concluded that Americans were far more religious than the
people of other nations; 95 percent of those surveyed expressed a belief in God and a huge majority believed the Ten
Commandments had real meaning in their lives. And another study has found that an overwhelming majority of Americans
disapprove of adultery, teenage sex, pornography, abortion, and hard drugs.
And this same study showed a deep reverence for the importance of family ties and religious belief.
I think the items that we've discussed here today must be a key part of the nation's political agenda. For the first time the
Congress is openly and seriously debating and dealing with the prayer and abortion issues—and that's enormous progress
right there. I repeat: America is in the midst of a spiritual awakening and a moral renewal. And with your biblical keynote, I
say today, "Yes, let justice roll on like a river, righteousness like a never-failing stream."
Now, obviously, much of this new political and social consensus I've talked about is based on a positive view of American
history, one that takes pride in our country's accomplishments and record. But we must never forget that no government
schemes are going to perfect man. We know that living in this world means dealing with what philosophers would call the
phenomenology of evil or, as theologians would put it, the doctrine of sin.
There is sin and evil in the world, and we're enjoined by Scripture and the Lord Jesus to oppose it with all our might. Our
nation, too, has a legacy of evil with which it must deal. The glory of this land has been its capacity for transcending the
moral evils of our past. For example, the long struggle of minority citizens for equal rights, once a source of disunity and
civil war, is now a point of pride for all Americans. We must never go back.
There is no room for racism, anti-Semitism, or other forms of ethnic and racial hatred in this country.
I know that you've been horrified, as have I, by the resurgence of some hate groups preaching bigotry and prejudice. Use
the mighty voice of your pulpits and the powerful standing of your churches to denounce and isolate these hate groups in
our midst. The commandment given us is clear and simple: "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself."
But whatever sad episodes exist in our past, any objective observer must hold a positive view of American history, a history
that has been the story of hopes fulfilled and dreams made into reality. Especially in this century, America has kept alight
the torch of freedom, but not just for ourselves but for millions of others around the world.
And this brings me to my final point today. During my first press conference as President, in answer to a direct question, I
pointed out that, as good Marxist-Leninists, the Soviet leaders have openly and publicly declared that the only morality they
recognize is that which will further their cause, which is world revolution.
I think I should point out I was only quoting Lenin, their guiding spirit, who said in 1920 that they repudiate all morality that
proceeds from supernatural ideas—that's their name for religion—or ideas that are outside class conceptions. Morality is
entirely subordinate to the interests of class war. And everything is moral that is necessary for the annihilation of the old,
exploiting social order and for uniting the proletariat.
Well, I think the refusal of many influential people to accept this elementary fact of Soviet doctrine illustrates an historical
reluctance to see totalitarian powers for what they are. We saw this phenomenon in the 1930s. We see it too often today.
This doesn't mean we should isolate ourselves and refuse to seek an understanding with them. I intend to do everything I
can to persuade them of our peaceful intent, to remind them that it was the West that refused to use its nuclear monopoly
in the forties and fifties for territorial gain and which now proposes 50-percent cut in strategic ballistic missiles and the
elimination of an entire class of land-based, intermediate-range nuclear missiles.
At the same time, however, they must be made to understand we will never compromise our principles and standards. We
will never give away our freedom. We will never abandon our belief in God. And we will never stop searching for a genuine
peace. But we can assure none of these things America stands for through the so-called nuclear freeze solutions proposed
by some.
The truth is that a freeze now would be a very dangerous fraud, for that is merely the illusion of peace. The reality is that we
must find peace through strength.
I would agree to a freeze if only we could freeze the Soviets' global desires. A freeze at current levels of weapons would
remove any incentive for the Soviets to negotiate seriously in Geneva and virtually end our chances to achieve the major
arms reductions which we have proposed. Instead, they would achieve their objectives through the freeze.
A freeze would reward the Soviet Union for its enormous and unparalleled military buildup. It would prevent the essential
and long overdue modernization of United States and allied defenses and would leave our aging forces increasingly
vulnerable. And an honest freeze would require extensive prior negotiations on the systems and numbers to be limited and
on the measures to ensure effective verification and compliance. And the kind of a freeze that has been suggested would
be virtually impossible to verify.
Such a major effort would divert us completely from our current negotiations on achieving substantial reductions.
A number of years ago, I heard a young father, a very prominent young man in the entertainment world, addressing a
tremendous gathering in California. It was during the time of the cold war, and communism and our own way of life were
very much on people's minds. And he was speaking to that subject. And suddenly, though, I heard him saying, "I love my
little girls more than anything—" And I said to myself, "Oh, no, don't. You can't—don't say that." But I had underestimated
him.
He went on: "I would rather see my little girls die now, still believing in God, than have them grow up under communism
and one day die no longer believing in God."
There were thousands of young people in that audience. They came to their feet with shouts of joy. They had instantly
recognized the profound truth in what he had said, with regard to the physical and the soul and what was truly important.
Yes, let us pray for the salvation of all of those who live in that totalitarian darkness—pray they will discover the joy of
knowing God. But until they do, let us be aware that while they preach the supremacy of the state, declare its omnipotence
over individual man, and predict its eventual domination of all peoples on the Earth, they are the focus of evil in the modern
world.
It was C.S. Lewis who, in his unforgettable "Screwtape Letters," wrote: "The greatest evil is not done now in those sordid
'dens of crime' that Dickens loved to paint. It is not even done in concentration camps and labor camps. In those we see its
final result. But it is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried and minuted) in clear, carpeted, warmed, and
well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise
their voice."
Well, because these "quiet men" do not "raise their voices," because they sometimes speak in soothing tones of
brotherhood and peace, because, like other dictators before them, they're always making "their final territorial demand,"
some would have us accept them at their word and accommodate ourselves to their aggressive impulses. But if history
teaches anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly.
It means the betrayal of our past, the squandering of our freedom.
So, I urge you to speak out against those who would place the United States in a position of military and moral inferiority.
You know, I've always believed that old Screwtape reserved his best efforts for those of you in the church.
So, in your discussions of the nuclear freeze proposals, I urge you to beware the temptation of pride—the temptation of
blithely declaring yourselves above it all and label both sides equally at fault, to ignore the facts of history and the
aggressive impulses of an evil empire, to simply call the arms race a giant misunderstanding and thereby remove yourself
from the struggle between right and wrong and good and evil.
I ask you to resist the attempts of those who would have you withhold your support for our efforts, this administration's
efforts, to keep America strong and free, while we negotiate real and verifiable reductions in the world's nuclear arsenals
and one day, with God's help, their total elimination.
While America's military strength is important, let me add here that I've always maintained that the struggle now going on
for the world will never be decided by bombs or rockets, by armies or military might. The real crisis we face today is a
spiritual one; at root, it is a test of moral will and faith.
Whittaker Chambers, the man whose own religious conversion made him a witness to one of the terrible traumas of our
time, the Hiss-Chambers case, wrote that the crisis of the Western World exists to the degree in which the West is
indifferent to God, the degree to which it collaborates in communism's attempt to make man stand alone without God.
And then he said, for Marxism-Leninism is actually the second oldest faith, first proclaimed in the Garden of Eden with the
words of temptation, "Ye shall be as gods."
The Western World can answer this challenge, he wrote, "but only provided that its faith in God and the freedom He enjoins
is as great as communism's faith in Man."
I believe we shall rise to the challenge. I believe that communism is another sad, bizarre chapter in human history whose
last pages even now are being written. I believe this because the source of our strength in the quest for human freedom is
not material, but spiritual. And because it knows no limitation, it must terrify and ultimately triumph over those who would
enslave their fellow man.
For in the words of Isaiah: "He giveth power to the faint; and to them that have no might He increased strength. . . . But they
that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be
weary. . . ."
Yes, change your world. One of our Founding Fathers, Thomas Paine, said, "We have it within our power to begin the
world over again." We can do it, doing together what no one church could do by itself.
God bless you, and thank you very much.
