
ON THE DECAY OF THE ART OF LYING
Page
5
of
9
Now their pretense of wanting to see the fourteen — and the other two whom they had
been less lucky with — was that commonest and mildest form of lying which is
sufficiently described as a deflection from the truth. Is it justifiable?
Most certainly. It is beautiful, it is noble; for its object is, not to reap profit, but to
convey a pleasure to the sixteen. The iron-souled truth-monger would plainly manifest, or
even utter the fact that he didn't want to see those people — and he would be an ass, and
inflict totally unnecessary pain. And next, those ladies in that far country — but never
mind, they had a thousand pleasant ways of lying, that grew out of gentle impulses, and
were a credit to their intelligence and an honor to their hearts. Let the particulars go. The
men in that far country were liars, every one. Their mere howdy-do was a lie, because
they didn't care how you did, except they were undertakers. To the ordinary inquirer you
lied in return; for you made no conscientious diagnostic of your case, but answered at
random, and usually missed it considerably. You lied to the undertaker, and said your
health was failing — a wholly commendable lie, since it cost you nothing and pleased the
other man.
If a stranger called and interrupted you, you said with your hearty tongue, "I'm glad to see
you," and said with your heartier soul, "I wish you were with the cannibals and it was
dinner-time." When he went, you said regretfully, "Must you go?" and followed it with
a "Call again;" but you did no harm, for you did not deceive anybody nor inflict any hurt,
whereas the truth would have made you both unhappy. I think that all this courteous lying
is a sweet and loving art, and should be cultivated. The highest perfection of politeness is
only a beautiful edifice, built, from the base to the dome, of graceful and gilded forms of
charitable and unselfish lying.